Roma, 10.1.2015
Egregio
Lettore,
di seguito riporto gli elementi significativi raccolti
sulla moneta di figura:
Tetradrammo1,
zecca di Antiochia (?), 36÷34 a. C.2, RPC
I 4094
Descrizione sommaria:
D. BACIΛICCA
KΛEOΠATΡA ΘεA NEOTEPA3.
Cleopatra, testa diademata a destra, busto
drappeggiato e ingioiellato. Bordo perlinato.
R. ANTONIωC
AΥTOKPATωP TPITON TRIωN
ANΔΡωN4. Antonio,
testa nuda a destra. Bordo perlinato5
La ricerca nel web di monete di tipologia simile a
quelle di figura ha prodotto i seguenti risultati:
- http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=181306
251, Lot: 231. Estimate $1000. Sold for $3583.
SYRIA, Seleucis and Pieria. Antioch. Mark Antony
and Cleopatra. 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm (25mm, 13.80
g, 12h). Diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra
right / Bare head of Mark Antony right. McAlee
174; Prieur 27; RPC 4094. Fine, porous. .. I
commenti che seguono sulla moneta sono tratti da:
http://www.edgarlowen.com/antony-cleopatra-10739.jpg
10739. EXCESSIVELY RARE SILVER TETRADRACHM OF
MARC ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA, CIRCA 39 BC. SYRIA,
Seleucis and Pieria, Antioch mint. Mark Antony
and Cleopatra. 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm (25mm,
13.80 g, 12h). Diademed and draped bust of
Cleopatra right / Bare head of Mark Antony
right. McAlee 174; Prieur 27; RPC 4094. Fine,
rough surfaces but both faces quite clear and
of fine style. Obverse: Bust of Cleopatra
facing right attired in her royal robes and
diadem, wearing a necklace probably of large
pearls which supports a pendant, the bust
surrounded by Greek legend BACILICCA KLEOPATRA
THEA NEOTERA = 'The Younger Queen Goddess
Cleopatra'. Reverse: Bare head of Marc Antony
facing right, surrounded by Greek legend
ANTWNIOC AYTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN ANDPWN =
'Antony Imperator Third Proclamation'. This excessively rare silver
tetradrachm is believed by numismatic scholars
to have been struck sometime between 36 and 34
BC, most likely at a mint in Syria where they
often Summered. Michael
Grant thinks it most likely that it was struck
in 34 BC in connection with the great
Donations of that year, in which Antony
conferred much of the Eastern Mediterranean in
a whole series of titles, territories and
overlordships upon Cleopatra and her children.
References: Michael Grant, Cleopatra, 1992,
Barnes & Noble, pps. 168, 175 where he
discusses the facts surrounding the issuance
of this coin. Also, Burnett, Amandry &
Ripolles, Roman Provincial Coinage, Volume I,
# 4094, published jointly by the British
Museum Press and the Bibliotech National,
1992. Grade: Fine. The tragic love story of
Marc Antony and Cleopatra has been told and
retold since antiquity by everyone from
Plutarch through Shakespeare to Hollywood. The
suicides of Antony and Cleopatra in August, 30
BC brought an end not only to the Ptolemaic
Dynasty in Egypt, but to the entire
Hellenistic age. Thenceforth Rome was master
of the whole Mediterranean and the great age
of Imperial Rome commenced. (see the coin of
Octavian listed directly below for the
victorious Roman ruler's commemoration of
their defeat!) In spite of their fame, few
coins depicting the portraits of both Antony
and Cleopatra were struck, and of those struck
the current type is the finest, the largest
and the rarest. Coins with good portraits of
Cleopatra are especially rare. In fact
surviving contemporary portraits of Cleopatra
in any medium are rare, and coins like the
current example, engraved as they were during
her lifetime under joint authority with
Antony, give us one of the best
representations of how she and Antony actually
appeared. Here we see the strong features of
the virile, impetuous Antony, bareheaded and
ready to plunge into some grand new
earth-shaking endeavor, and on the obverse,
the stately elegant bust of Cleopatra, attired
in her royal robes and jewelry. An
extraordinary face, haughty, arrogant,
ruthless, but clearly of great intelligence
and commanding presence. Without doubt this
coin type has one of the finest numismatic
portraits of both Marc Antony and Cleopatra
extant. This example though with the wear
normally found still has clear portraits of
both rulers and as such is worthy of the best
collections. An extremely rare coin with only
44 examples known to RPC.
- https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=953&lot=327
Lot 327 Estimate: 10000 USD Cleopatra VII and Mark
Antony. Tetradrachm, (12h). Syria or Phoenicia, c.
36 BC. Obv: BACIΛICCA KΛEOΠAT[PA ΘEA NEWTEPA]
Diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra right. Rx:
ANTWNIOC AYTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN ANΔ[PWN] Bare
head of Antony right. RPC 4094 (43 spec., 21 obv.
dies). Prieur 27 (53 spec.). Toned VF.
- http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=272908
Triton XVIII, Lot: 893. Estimate $10000. SYRIA,
Seleucis and Pieria. Antioch. Mark Antony &
Cleopatra. 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm (27mm, 15.00 g,
12h). BACIΛICCA KΛЄOΠATPA [ΘЄA NЄωTЄPA], diademed
bust of Cleopatra right, wearing earring,
necklace, and embroidered dress / [ANT]ωNIOC
AVTOKPATωP TRITON TPIωN ANΔ[PωN], bare head of
Antony right. McAlee 174; Prieur 27; BMC 53; RPC I
4094. VF, deep cabinet tone, very minor porosity,
slightly off center. Rare. Current Status. Triton
XVIII, Lot: 893. Currently: $12000. High Bidder
Greek7. Bidders (3).
- http://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=1460&category=30629&lot=1320180
Estimate: 10'000 USD Starting price: 5'000 USD
Price realized: 36'000 USD Mark Antony and
Cleopatra. Silver Tetradrachm (14.9 g), 36 BC.
Antioch. BACIΛICCA KΛEOΠ[ATPA ΘEA NEω]TEPA,
diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra right.
Reverse: ANTωNIOC AY[TOKPATωP T]PITON TPIωN
ANΔPωN, bare head of Mark Antony right. McAlee
174; Prieur 27; RPC I 4094. Both portraits are
outstanding. Nice antique, slightly iridescent,
toning. Slight flan crack on obverse at 2 o'clock
and on corresponding reverse. Choice Very Fine.
Estimated Value $10,000 - 13,000 Ex George Zacos
& P. Hanaz Antiquities, Grand Bazar, Istanbul.
Included with original envelope.
- http://romanumismatics.com/archive/auction-viii/lot/0910/
Marc Antony and Cleopatra AR Tetradrachm.
Uncertain Phoenician mint, 36 BC. BACIΛICCA
KΛEOΠATPA ΘEA NEWTEPA, diademed and draped bust of
Cleopatra right, her dress embroidered with pearls
/ ANTWNIOC AYTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN ANDPWN, bare
head of Antony right. RPC 4094; McAlee 174; Prieur
27; BMC 53. 15.08g, 27mm, 1h. Near Extremely Fine.
Near Extremely Fine. Good metal for the issue, and
aesthetically very pleasing. Rare. 30,000Lst. Good
metal for the issue, and aesthetically very
pleasing. Rare. This tetradrachm, struck after the
return of Antony to the East, proclaims the new
political alliance between the triumvir and the
Egyptian queen Cleopatra. Antony’s choice to leave
the sister of his rival Octavian was a bold move
which completely separated him from his homeland,
though the many titles and honours he received
when he made this transition are symptomatic of
the irresistible allure of the luxurious Eastern
world. Despite Antony having been away for four
years, during which time he had married another
woman and fathered two daughters (see lot 926 for
the younger daughter, Antonia Minor), Cleopatra
eagerly accepted Antony’s invitation to join him
in Antioch, where the two were married and made
ostentatious display of their partnership. Her
acquiescence is understandable considering that
she had already borne twins for Antony, and no
doubt considered herself equal to the task of
beguiling him once more and manipulating him to
her will. The difficulty of maintaining the
Ptolemaic Kingdom intact while Rome greedily ogled
her rich and bountiful, but weak, country was no
doubt the prime motivating factor. Though this
coin confirms their political union, the
individual sovereignty of both Cleopatra and
Antony is distinctly maintained by their placement
on obverse and reverse respectively rather than
displaying them in a conjoined bust format. This issue has been traditionally
assigned to Antioch, however R. McAlee points out
that the letter forms (C for Σ and ω for Ω) are
inconsistent with those on contemporary Antiochene
issues. Moreover, Antioch remained in Roman rule
despite Antony granting vast tracts of territory
to Cleopatra. The placement
of Cleopatra, not Antony, on the obverse also
points to a mint within Egyptian territory,
perhaps in Phoenicia. For this same reason, a
military mint moving with Antony appears unlikely.
Nonetheless, the dating of the coin suggests that
it may well have been issued in support of Antony,
and in particular of his Parthian campaign, a
great undertaking involving more than 100,000
Roman and allied troops which ultimately proved to
be a complete failure that cost the lives of about
25,000 men. This joint issue coinage (along with
the similar denarius type) no doubt contributed to
the increasingly prevalent view in Rome that
Antony had deserted his Roman values and indeed
the Roman people; a view that was shortly
thereafter firmly cemented by the Donations of
Alexandria, in which ceremony Antony paraded
himself dressed as Dionysus and proceeded to
distribute Rome’s eastern territories to the
children of Cleopatra and grant them many titles.
When Octavian obtained Marc Antony’s from the
temple of Vesta, distaste turned to outrage as it
was read out in the Senate that Antony wished to
be buried with Cleopatra in Alexandria. When the
Third Triumvirate expired on the last day of 33 BC
the Roman world again found itself at war.
- http://www.mycrandall.ca/courses/NTIntro/images/AntonCleoCoin.htm
Mean Diameter: 26.5 mm. (1.04"). Weight: 15.10 gm.
(0.472 Troy oz.). Metal composition: Nearly pure
silver with natural toning. References: Michael
Grant, Cleopatra, 1992, Barnes & Noble, pps.
168, 175 where he discusses the facts surrounding
the issuance of this coin. Also, Burnett, Amandry
& Ripolles, Roman Provincial Coinage, Volume
I, # 4094, published jointly by the British Museum
Press and the Bibliotech National, 1992. Grade:
Near extra fine. Price: On request. Status: Sold.
Order #C006. This excessively rare silver
tetradrachm is believed by numismatic scholars to
have been struck sometime between 36 and 34 BC,
most likely at a mint in Syria where they often
Summered. Michael Grant thinks it most likely that
it was struck in 34 BC in connection with the
great Donations of that year, in which Antony
conferred much of the Eastern Mediterranean in a
whole series of titles, territories and
overlordships upon Cleopatra and her children.
Obverse: Bust of Cleopatra facing right attired in
her royal robes and diadem, wearing a necklace
probably of large pearls which supports a pendant,
the bust surrounded by Greek legend BACILICCA
KLEOPATRA THEA NEOTERA = 'The Younger Queen
Goddess Cleopatra'. Reverse: Bare head of Marc
Antony facing right, surrounded by Greek legend
ANTWNIOC AYTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN ANDPWN = 'Antony
Imperator Third Proclamation'.
- http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=27686
Sale: Triton VI, Lot: 574. Estimate $3000. Closing
Date: Monday, 13 January 2003. Sold For $4250.
SYRIA, Seleucis and Pieria. Antioch(?). Mark
Antony and Cleopatra. Circa 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm
(14.17 gm). [BACILICCA] KLEOPATRA QEA NEW[TEPA],
diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra right, her
dress embroidered with pearls / ANTWNIOC
AVTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN [ANDPWN], bare head of
Antony right. RPC I 4094; Prieur 27; BMC Galatia
pg. 158, 53. Toned VF, moderate porosity. Rare;
fine portraits of Cleopatra and Antony. ($3000).
Ex Münzen und Medaillens 23 (17-18 June 1993), lot
477.
- http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/194522
Tetradrachm (Coin) Portraying Cleopatra and Mark
Antony, about 36 B.C. Silver Diam. 2.6 cm (1 1/16
in.), 15.22 g Katherine K. Adler Memorial Fund,
2008.173 Ancient and Byzantine Art Gallery 152
Cleopatra (69–30 B.C.) ruled Egypt during the
period when Rome was slowly absorbing the eastern
Mediterranean and its vast riches. By allying
herself first with Julius Caesar and then, after
his assassination, with Mark Antony (83–30 B.C.),
she hoped to maintain her own authority and
Egypt’s independence. The powerful political
alliance between Antony and Cleopatra worried
Caesar’s heir, his great-nephew Octavian, who in
31 B.C. defeated the couple in a sea battle.
Rather than suffer the humiliation of surrendering
to Octavian, Cleopatra and Antony killed
themselves. By pairing their
faces on coinage, the rulers advertised their
powerful partnership, which was so strong that
they are shown with the same face on this coin.
Cleopatra’s profile is a copy of Antony’s
portrait. However, by placing her image on the
front (primary side) of the coin, Cleopatra is
presented as the more important of the two rulers.
Moreover, her portrait is larger than Antony’s,
extending to her shoulders and featuring her
legendary pearl jewelry. A crown circling her
carefully braided hair symbolizes her status as a
queen. To pay their armies and satisfy their other
debts, the ambitious Roman warlord Mark Antony and
the charismatic Egyptian queen Cleopatra minted
coins bearing their portraits. Antony is shown
with the short hair that was the typical Roman
fashion of the time, but also with distinctive
features including a flat nose, a strong chin, and
a long, thick neck. Although regally adorned in
her legendary pearl jewelry, Cleopatra’s physical
attributes surprisingly mimic those of Antony,
right down to the Adam’s apple on her massive
neck. Since coins changed hands easily, they were
an especially effective way of spreading the
political ideologies of those who issued them. A
person who saw these coins would not only equate
Cleopatra and her power with Antony and his, but
would also understand that she was the more
important of the two because her image appears on
the front of the coin, while his is relegated to
the back. Since the once glorious kingdom of Egypt
survived entirely on Roman sufferance, this was a
bold claim on the part of the couple, one that
undoubtedly offended their enemies in Rome.
- http://wildwinds.com/coins/imp/cleopatra/RPC_4094.jpg
From the Gemini V Auction, Closed January 6,
2009. Lot# 753Estimate: US$4000 Ptolemaic
Kingdom. Cleopatra VII and Mark Antony. ca. 36 BC.
Silver tetradrachm (15.07 gm). BACIËÉCCA ÊËÅÏÐÁÔÑÁ
ÈÅÁ ÍÅùÔÅÑÁ, diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra
VII right / ÁÍÔùÍÉÏC AYTOKRATùÑ TPITON ÔÑÉùÍ
ÁÍ?ÑùÍ, bare head of Mark Antony right. Svoronos
1897, pl. xliii, 22–23. RPC 4094. Prieur 27. Good
fine. Ex CNG 75, 23 May 2007, lot 841. ...
Lot 753 sold for high bid of $3750 [ $4312.5, or
approx 3191.25 EUR, 2932.5 GBP.
- http://www.goldbergcoins.com/view-auctions/catalog/id/28/lot/65000/
Mark Antony and Cleopatra. Silver Tetradrachm
(16.2g). Minted at Syria, Antioch, ca. 36 BC.
Diademed and draped bust right of Cleopatra VII
(Ptolemaic Queen of Egypt and Antony's fifth
wife), wearing a pearl-embroidered dress. Reverse:
Bare head of Antony right. RPC 4094; Prieur 27;
Svor. 1897, pl. IXIII, 22-23. Rare. Nicely toned a
light slate gray. Excellent portraits on a full,
pleasing flan. A desierable example of the type.
Very Fine. Estimated Value $10,000 - 12,000. Ex
Ebert Collection, lot 5587.
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/antiquitiesproject/6059785463/
RR87 A Rare and Exceptional Roman Imperatorial
Silver Tetradrachm of Marc Antony and Cleopatra
VII, With Exceptional Likenesses of Two of the
Most Famous Personages of Antiquity The Roman
Republic Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra
Tetradrachm, Antiochia ad Orontem Syriae secondary
mint (?) circa 36, AR 13.32 g. BACILICCA
KΛ'EOΠATΡA ΘEA NEΩTEΡA Diademed bust of Cleopatra
r. Rev. ANTWNIOC AYTOKPATWR TΡITON TRIWN ANDRWN
Bare head of M. Antonius r. C 2. BMC 53. RPC 4094.
Prieur 27. Kraay- Hirmer pl. 220, 809. Butcher,
Coinage in Roman Syria p. 57, fig. 8.1. Very rare.
Two magnificent portraits struck on unusually good
metal for the issue. Lovely old cabinet tone and
good very fine.
- http://www.ancientmoney.org/ri/cleopatra_antony_tet.html
Cleopatra VII 69-30 BC and Marc Antony 83-30 BC AR
(81%) tetradrachm 15.0362 gm, 26.7 mm Antioch (?)
36 BC 1. Burnett, Andrew, Michel Amandry, and Pere
Pau Ripollès. 1998. Roman Provincial Coinage
Volume I: From the death of Caesar to the death of
Vitellius. Pages 601-602 #4094 and Plate 155
#4094. London: British Museum Press. 2. Wroth,
Warwick. 1899. Catalogue of the Greek Coins of
Galatia, Cappadocia, and Syria. Page 158 #53 and
Plate XIX #3. London: The Trustees of the British
Museum. 3. Svoronos, J. N. 1904. Ta
Nomismata tou Kratous ton Ptolemaion, Volume 2.
Page 316 #1897 and Plate LXIII #22-23. Athens:
Tupios P. D. Sakellairou Obverse Bust of Cleopatra
facing right wearing diadem, earring, pearl
necklace, and dress embroidered in front with
pearls. Border of dots. ΒΑΣΙΛΙΣΣΑ ΚΛΕΟΠΑΤΡΑ ΘΕΑ
ΝΕΩΤΕΡΑ. The lunate forms of Σ and Ε, and W for Ω
appear in the coin's inscriptions. Reverse Bare
head of Antony facing right, border of dots.
ΑΝΤΩΝΙΟΣ ΑΥΤΟΚΡΑΤΩΡ ΤΡΙΤΟΝ ΤΡΙΩΝ ΑΝΔΡΩΝ.
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/julio-claudians/8138442150/
Joe Geranio Mark Antony and Cleopatra. 36 BC. AR
Tetradrachm (12.34 g, 12h). Antioch in Syria mint.
BACIΛICCA KΛЄOΠATPA ΘЄA NЄωTЄPA, diademed and
draped bust of Cleopatra right, her dress
embroidered with pearls / ANTωNIOC AYTOKPATωP
TPITON TPIωN [ANDPωN], bare head Mark Antony and
Cleopatra. 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm (12.34 g, 12h).
Antioch in Syria mint. BACIΛICCA KΛЄOΠATPA ΘЄA
NЄωTЄPA, diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra
right, her dress embroidered with pearls /
ANTωNIOC AYTOKPATωP TPITON TPIωN [ANDPωN], bare
head of Antony right. RPC 4094; McAlee 174; Prieur
27; BMC 53. These tetradrachms, struck after the
separation of Antony and Octavia, herald the
political alliance between the triumvir and the
Egyptian queen. Lacking any more certain
alternative, this issue has been assigned to
Antioch. During this time, Antony was continually
moving throughout the eastern provinces, as well
as against Parthia. Consequently, these coins
could have been struck anywhere in order to
facilitate an ad hoc payment for his soldiers. R.
McAlee, in his forthcoming book on Roman Antioch,
points out that the letter forms – C for Σ and ω
for Ω – are inconsistent with those on
contemporary Antiochene issues. Those issues with
a horse-head control mark to the left of Antony’s
head may hint at a possible mint further east,
connecting it with Antony’s Armenian intevention
in 34 BC, or, more attractively, the invasion of
Parthia in 36 BC (cf. Shore 92 for Parthian bronze
issues with a very similar horse-head design),
events commemorated in an elaborate political
display in Alexandria later in 34 BC. Such
posturings clearly demonstrated Antony’s political
ambition to separate the eastern Roman provinces,
combine them with the Ptolemaic kingdom, and
create a new empire of his own.
- http://numismatics.org/collection/1967.152.567
Silver Tetradrachm of Antony and Cleopatra,
Antioch, 36 BC. 1967.152.567 Obverse: BACIAICCA
KLEOPATPA THEA NEUTEPA - Mark Anthony hd. bare r.
reverse Reverse: ANTUNIOC AYTOKPATUP TPITON TPIUN
ANADPUN - Cleopatra bust diad. dr. r. Physical
Description Axis: 12 Measurements Weight: 15.322
Diameter: 26mm Date: 36 BC Denomination:
Tetradrachm Material: Silver. Reference:
RPC1.4094. Identifier: 1967.152.567. Department:
Greek Collection: American Numismatic Society.
- http://www.deamoneta.com/auctions/view/103/1987
Mark Antony and Cleopatra. Syria, Antioch. AR
Tetradrachm c. 36 BC. Diademed and draped bust of
Cleopatra r. / Bare head of Mark Antony r. McAlee
174; Prieur 27; RPC 4094. 13.32g, 26mm, 12h. Toned
Fair. Base d'asta: £ 80.
- Vcoins
Cleopatra and Marc (Mark) Antony AR Tetradrachm,
Syria, Seleucis and Pieria (Antioch?) -
Cleopatra/Marc Antony - Rare. Cleopatra and Marc
Antony AR Tetradrachm, ca. 36 BC, 14.62gm, Syria,
Seleucis and Pieria (Antioch?), 26mm.� Obv:
BACILICCA KLeOPATRA QeA NewTeRA (translation:
"Queen Cleopatra, Thea, the younger"); diademed
and draped bust of Cleopatra right, her dress
embroidered with pearls.� Rev: ANTwNIOC AYTOKRATwR
TRITON TRIwN ANDRwN (translation: "Antony,
Imperator for the third time, Triumvir"); bare
head of Antony right.� RPC I 4094; Prieur 27.�
Fine. Precio: US$ 2,495.00 € 2,112.08 Producto
vendido Cotización al: 1/11/2015.
- http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=103749
Sale: CNG 75, Lot: 841. Estimate $3000. Closing
Date: Wednesday, 23 May 2007. Sold For $4100. This
amount does not include the buyer’s fee. SYRIA,
Seleucis and Pieria. Antioch(?). Mark Antony and
Cleopatra. Circa 36 BC. AR Tetradrachm (15.05 g,
12h). Diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra right,
her dress embroidered with pearls / Bare head of
Antony right. RPC I 4094; Prieur 27 . Good Fine,
toned.
- http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/displayimage.php?pos=-2731
Marc Antony Tetradrachm Seller's description:
Obverse: Diademed and draped bust of Cleopatra
right, her dress embroidered with pearls. Text
around BACILICCA KLEOPATRA QEA NEWTERA. Reverse:
Bare head of Mark Antony right. Text around
ANTWNIOC AVTOKPATWP TPITON TPIWN ANDRWN.
REPRODUCTION, has copy mark 'WRL' stamped on one
side.
Veniamo alle conclusioni: osservo in primo luogo che
la moneta di figura presenta caratteristiche fisiche
difformi dai conȋ autentici d'epoca, risultando il
peso eccessivamente basso; inoltre, specie sulla
superficie del rovescio, il fondo della moneta appare
dalla foto costellato di numerosi piccoli avvallamenti
che potrebbero derivare dalla realizzazione per
fusione invece che per conio. Non posso escludere che
la moneta sia la stessa illustrata nel link18,
dalla quale sia stato cassato il marchio di fabbrica WRL (Westair
Reproductions Ltd).
Un saluto cordiale.
Giulio De Florio
-----------------------------------------------
Note:
(1) Tetradrammo
(argento). Raccolgo in tabella le caratteristiche
fisiche dei tetradrammi della tipologia di figura
tratte dai link di cui sopra:
Riferimenti |
Peso
(g.) |
Diametro
(mm) |
Asse di
conio (h) |
Link01 |
13,80 |
25 |
12 |
Link02 |
- |
- |
12 |
Link03 |
15 |
27 |
12 |
Link04 |
14,9 |
- |
- |
Link05 |
15,08 |
27 |
1 |
Link06 |
15,10 |
26,5 |
- |
Link07 |
14,17 |
- |
- |
Link08 |
15,22 |
26 |
- |
Link09 |
15,07 |
- |
- |
Link10 |
16,2 |
- |
- |
Link11 |
13,32 |
- |
- |
Link12 |
15,04 |
26,7 |
- |
Link13 |
12,34 |
- |
12 |
Link14 |
15,322 |
26 |
12 |
Link15 |
13,32 |
26 |
12 |
Link16 |
14,62 |
26 |
- |
Link17 |
15,05 |
- |
12 |
Si evince dalla tabella che la moneta in esame (7g,
25mm, 12h) presenta caratteristiche fisiche che, per
quanto concerne il peso, si discostano in modo
sostanziale da quelle delle monete autentiche del
periodo.
(2) Non c'è unanimità tra gli
studiosi circa la data e la zecca alle quali si
possa attribuire questa emissione (v. linka e linkb):
alcuni ritengono che la moneta sia stata battuta tra
il 36 e il 34 a. C. da una zecca siriana
(convenzionalmente Antiochia) dove Antonio e
Cleopatra solevano svernare; R. McAlee rileva che l'uso della C al posto
della Σ e della ω al posto della Ω non è tipico
della monetazione antiochese, oltre tutto Antiochia
rimase sotto il controllo romano, nonostante le
vaste concessioni territoriali alla regina d'Egitto.
Michael Grant ritiene più probabile
la data del 34 a. C, l'anno delle grandi donazioni
nel quale Antonio assegnò a Cleopatra e ai di lei
figli larga parte del Mediterraneo Orientale sotto
forma di titoli, territori, feudi. L'aver
posto l'immagine di Cleopatra sul dritto della
moneta farebbe pensare ad una zecca in area
egiziana, forse in Fenicia, ciò che porterebbe ad
escludere una zecca itinerante al seguito di
Antonio. Nondimeno la presenza di Cleopatra al
dritto e Antonio al rovescio farebbe pensare ad
un'emissione in supporto di Antonio in occasione
della campagna partica che vide coinvolti più di
centomila soldati romani e alleati in un'impresa
disastrosa nella quale persero la vita
venticinquemila uomini. Il dott. Ted Buttrey del
Fitzwilliam Museum di Cambridge rileva in una mail
che le leggende delle monete tolemaiche in lingua
greca, come quelle di altri regni orientali, sono
sempre espresse al genitivo, al contrario di quelle
romane nelle quali i nomi dei personaggi sono
enunciati al nominativo. Su questa moneta invece le
leggende, pur in lingua greca, sono espresse al
nominativo, il che suggerisce a T.B. che la moneta
sia stata battuta in una città o zecca sotto il
controllo di Antonio nella quale ci si esprimeva in
greco (probabilmente Damasco, a giudicare dallo
stile di Cleopatra).
(3) BACIΛICCA KΛEOΠATΡA ΘεA
NEOTEPA, cioè Regina (basilissa) Cleopatra Thea la
Giovane (Neòtera). A proposito dell'appellativo
"Thea" che accompagna la moneta in esame si noterà
che è l'appellativo di un'altra Cleopatra (Cleopatra
Thea Evergete), n. 164 circa, m. 121 a. C., di
stirpe tolemaica ma entrata per matrimonio nella
dinastia Seleucide di Siria. Dunque il nome scelto
da Cleopatra la Giovane fa riferimento a questa sua
antenata, essenzialmente nell'intento di riportare
in vita la dinastia Seleucide, rovesciata da Roma,
mentre la Siria, in termini militari sotto il
controllo di Antonio, era politicamente condiviso
con la regina d'Egitto.
(4) ANTONIωC AΥTOKPATωP TPITON
TRIωN ANΔΡωN, è la titolatura di Antonio,
equivalente al latino "Antonius Imperator III,
triumvir" [Antonio, generale acclamato per la terza
volta (=triton), triumviro (triωn anδρωn)].
(5) Un'interessante osservazione
viene enunciata nel linkc di cui
sopra che traduco integralmente: "Associando i
loro volti sulla moneta, Cleopatra e Antonio
intesero propagandare la solidità della loro
alleanza, talmente forte che essi sono rappresentati
sulla moneta con lo stesso volto. Il profilo di
Cleopatra è una copia del ritratto di Antonio.
Tuttavia, essendo Cleopatra ritratta nel
dritto della moneta, si presenta, tra i due, come il
personaggio più importante. Inoltre, il suo ritratto
è più grande di quello di Antonio, includendo anche
il mezzo busto adorno di una collana di perle. La
corona che circonda i suoi capelli accuratamente
intrecciati simboleggia il suo status regale. Marco
Antonio è rappresentato con i capelli corti, secondo
lo stile romano del tempo, ma anche con le
caratteristiche proprie distintive, il naso piatto,
il mento forte, e il collo lungo e spesso. Sebbene
regalmente adorna dei suoi leggendari gioielli, gli
attributi fisici di Cleopatra sorprendentemente
imitano quelli di Antonio. Poiché passavano di mano
facilmente, le monete erano un mezzo estremamente
efficace per diffondere le ideologie politiche di
coloro che le emettevano. Una persona che ne avesse
avuta una tra le mani non solo avrebbe equiparato il
potere di Cleopatra con quello di Antonio ma avrebbe
anche compreso che, tra i due, la donna era il
personaggio più importante perché la sua immagine
compariva sul fronte della moneta. Dal momento che
il regno una volta glorioso d'Egitto sopravviveva
solo per la tacita condiscendenza dei Romani, lo
sfacciato proclama della coppia era tale da ferire i
loro nemici presenti in Roma."
In proposito, pur condividendo le argomentazioni sui
profili del volto svolte da
Katherine K. Adler, qualche perplessità mi è
sorta sull'ipotesi sottesa che un qualsiasi
cittadino romano, avendo in mano la moneta, avrebbe
potuto a prima vista distinguerne il dritto e, sulla
base di questo solo fatto, stabilire che Cleopatra
era il personaggio più importante in quanto
raffigurato sul dritto. Ho perciò coinvolto sul tema
il forum di numismatica Moneta-L di Yahoo, da cui ho
ricevuto conferma che, su una moneta con due teste,
l'unico modo di distinguere il dritto sia quello di
avviare uno studio complesso delle impronte delle
monete per verificare se la maggiore ricorrenza di
impronte identiche si registri per una faccia
piuttosto che per l'altra. Dal che si evince che il
cittadino comune romano avrebbe certamente potuto
rilevare che Antonio e la regina egiziana erano
stati messi sullo stesso piano ma non avrebbe potuto
affermare che da ciò derivava che Cleopatra era
ritratta sul dritto della moneta.
|